No 10 not telling the truth over Pincher, former civil servant claims

The former permanent secretary at the Foreign Office has said Downing Street 'keep changing their story'.

No 10 not telling the truth over Chris Pincher, former senior civil servant claims FlickrFlickr
McDonald: Former senior civil servant says No 10 is 'not telling the truth'.

No 10 is not telling the truth about Boris Johnson being unaware of any specific allegations of inappropriate behaviour made against Conservative MP Chris Pincher, according to a former senior civil servant.

It comes after Pincher quit as the party’s deputy chief whip following claims he drunkenly groped two men at a private member’s club in London.

On Monday, a Downing Street spokesperson told journalists that the Prime Minister was not aware of any specific allegations when Pincher was appointed to the role in February this year.

And they said it would have been “not appropriate” to have stopped his appointment in the absence of a formal complaint.

However, Simon McDonald, who was previously the top civil servant in the Foreign Office, has now stated that Johnson was briefed in person about a complaint of alleged groping made against Pincher in 2019.

Pincher had served as the minister for Europe and Americas in the Foreign Office between July 2019 and February 2020, before being made housing minister.

In a letter sent to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Kathryn Stone, Lord McDonald, now a crossbench peer, raised concerns over the statements made by Downing Street in relation to what was known about the complaints.

He said that he was now writing to Stone out of a “duty towards the victims”.

“Five days after Mr Pincher’s resignation as deputy chief whip, there remains significant confusion surrounding complaints about his behaviour prior to the drunkenness he admits at the Carlton Club on June 29,” McDonald wrote.

“Inaccurate claims by 10 Downing Street continue to be repeated in the media. On July 3, the BBC website reported: ‘No official complaints against [Mr Pincher] were ever made’.

“This is not true. In the summer of 2019, shortly after he was appointed minister of state at the Foreign Office, a group of officials complained to me about Mr Pincher’s behaviour.

“I discussed the matter with the relevant official at the Cabinet Office. (In substance, the allegations were similar to those made about his behaviour at the Carlton Club).

“An investigation upheld the complaint; Mr Pincher apologised and promised not to repeat the inappropriate behaviour. There was no repetition at the FCO before he left seven months later.

“The same BBC website report continued: “Downing Street has said Boris Johnson was not aware of any specific allegations when he appointed Mr Pincher deputy chief whip in February.”

“By July 4 the BBC website reflected a change in No 10’s line: “The prime minister’s official spokesman said Mr Johnson knew of ‘allegations that were either resolved or did not progress to a formal complaint,’ adding that ‘it was deemed not appropriate to stop an appointment simply because of unsubstantiated allegations’.”

“The original No 10 line is not true and the modification is still not accurate. Mr Johnson was briefed in person about the initiation and outcome of the investigation. There was a ‘formal complaint’.

“Allegations were ‘resolved’ only in the sense that the investigation was completed; Mr Pincher was not exonerated. To characterise the allegations as ‘unsubstantiated’ is therefore wrong.”

McDonald concluded: “I am aware that [it] is unusual to write to you and simultaneously publicise the letter.

“I am conscious of the duty owed to the target of an investigation but I act out of my duty towards the victims.

“Mr Pincher deceived me and others in 2019. He cannot be allowed to use the confidentiality of the process three years ago to pursue his predatory behaviour in other contexts.”