A woman has broken down in court while giving a graphic account about a night in 2003 when she alleges she emerged from unconsciousness to find US actor Danny Masterson raping her.
She is one of three women who allege the star of That ’70s Show raped them.
The woman told the court in Los Angeles that at one point during the incident, she grabbed Masterson’s hair to try to pull him away, but he shoved a pillow into her face.
“I was smothered,” she said, crying. “I could not breathe.”
She told the court she later grabbed his throat to try to push him away, but he held her down and began choking her.
Asked by the prosecutor what she was thinking at the time, the woman replied: “That he was going to kill me. That I was going to die.”
By this point the woman was weeping.
After she said “I can’t do this,” the judge called for a brief break and a court victims’ services advocate comforted her at the witness stand.
When her evidence resumed, the woman told the court that Masterson pulled a gun from a drawer in his bedside table and ordered her to be quiet when there was a commotion at the door.
She said that, throughout the night, she passed in and out of consciousness despite drinking only about half of a fruity vodka drink Masterson had handed her.
Masterson, 46, who at the time was a star of the Fox TV sitcom That ’70s Show, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of rape.
In a brief cross-examination before the trial ended for the day, questions from Masterson’s lawyer Phillip Cohen suggested that he would challenge the woman over differences in the story she told police in 2004, which did not lead to charges for Masterson, and her testimony on Wednesday afternoon.
She conceded that she had omitted elements of the story at the time “to protect people”.
At a preliminary hearing last year, a previous defence lawyer for Masterson emphasised that there was no mention of a gun in the LA police report from 2004, and contended the three women had each reframed consensual sex as rape.
Masterson, sitting at the defence table in a suit, looked toward the woman as she testified, but had no visible reaction. His wife, the actress and model Bijou Phillips, sat behind him at the front of the gallery, along with several of his family members and friends.
The witness testified that she had only intended to go to Masterson’s house to pick up a set of keys, and that her relationship had been uneasy with Masterson since the two had sex several months earlier, an incident she told police was consensual in 2004 but later decided she had not consented to. She went back to police in 2016.
In his cross-examination, Mr Cohen asked whether it was her position in 2004 that Masterson had raped her the first time they had sex, and she answered: “No.”
Asked whether that was her position now, she also answered “no”. Court adjourned before he could press her further.
All three of Masterson’s accusers were members of the Church of Scientology at the time they say they were raped, but have since left. Masterson remains a member.
Judge Charlaine Olmedo said before the trial that she would not allow Scientology to become a de facto defendant, but would allow limited discussion of it.
Before the woman took the stand Wednesday after beginning her testimony on Tuesday, the judge warned her not to stray too far into discussions of the religion, an issue she had already admonished Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller about.
However, the topic of Scientology still came up. The woman testified that some of her mutual friends filed so-called “knowledge reports” signalling their unhappiness with her after she told them about the initial incident with Masterson, and she was summoned by an ethics officer who forced her to make peace with him and take responsibility.
“You can never be a victim,” the woman said. “No matter what happens, you’re always responsible.”
Asked if she still feared retaliation from anyone for coming forward about Masterson, she replied: “About half this courtroom.”
She testified that she signed a non-disclosure agreement with Masterson in 2004, and accepted 400,000 US dollars (£355,000) over the course of a year, because the church was going to tar her as a “suppressive person” otherwise.
The woman said she had violated the agreement “about 50 times” since signing it.