News

You're not signed in
Sign in
Sign up

Head teacher jailed after being linked to paedophile ring

David Wilson was sentenced to two years behind bars and banned from working with children after admitting possessing nearly 3,000 illegal images.

27 November 2009 13:41 PM

140433
Head teacher jailed after being linked to paedophile ring


The former head teacher of a Fife secondary school, who was linked to Scotland's most evil paedophile ring, has been jailed for two years for child porn offences.

David Wilson was sentenced at the High Court in Edinburgh on Friday, after admitting possessing and downloading illegal images. His not guilty plea to a further charge of distributing the images was accepted.

The 48-year-old has been banned from working with children, listed on the sex offenders register and will be on licence for two years on his release.

Police found 2969 still images and video clips showing children involved in sex acts on the 48-year-old's laptops. About a third of them were at the most serious hard-core level.

The court heard how Wilson led a double life - running Auchmuty High School during the day but getting drunk and downloading sick images of children in his home in Paisley at night.

He was eventually snared after police found he had swapped emails with paedophile ring member John Milligan, who was sentenced to 17 years behind bars for the "prolific" distribution of child porn.

Ringleaders Neil Strachan and James Rennie were jailed for 16 and 13 years respectively, while a further 5 men will serve a total of 26 years. Police have also charged a further 60 men as part of the ongoing probe into the paedophile network.

Wilson's lawyer, Joe Barr, said his client first became hooked on kiddie porn when an innocent internet search for music by The Beach Boys produced unexpected images.

He added: "There is no doubt that thereafter he did deliberately search for that material."

Mr Barr claimed Wilson had "pressed the self destruct button" in his quest for images of abuse, ending an "illustrious" career.

Wilson had become a teacher in the early 1980s, becoming a deputy head in 1993 and being appointed head of Auchmuty High School in Glenrothes in 2006.

Two glowing reports from inspectors praised the work he was doing, tackling problems at the school.

However, the court heard that, as Wilson's career advanced, his personal life was falling apart, he was suffering from depression and he began drinking heavily.

Mr Barr said his marriage had broken up and he had become confused about his sexuality.

He resigned from his teaching post in February this year and had since made two suicide attempts.

Jailing him, judge Lord Kinclaven told him: "Those who view images of this sort contribute to the trade in child pornography.

"The courts require to mark the seriousness of such offending and protect the public. The public includes children."

Last updated: 27 November 2009, 13:49

Share

The links provided allow you to bookmark this page into your favourite social media website. For users with JavaScript disabled copy and paste the URL from the address bar into your chosen social bookmarking site.

There are 3 comments

You need to be logged in to comment.

sign in

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

  1. Default avatar

    1. 27 Nov 2009 19:59MISCHKA'SMUM said

    Two years? Why so lenient? Stick him in the nick and throw away the key. And why do these filth merchants always trot out such lame excuses re their personal lives? They are just dirty, filthy scumbags who ruin childrens lives. Just a pity the suicide attempts didn't work - hope it's third time lucky. If not, I hope the cons give him something to REALLY think about once he's inside. FILTH!!

    Report as unsuitable

  2. Default avatar

    2. 27 Nov 2009 21:12blue_chip said

    When will people realise, child porn may be sick to any normal person, but succumbing to the temptation only makes a paedophile HUMAN, it doesn't make them sick.

    It doesn't mean they actually wished harm to come to the children in the images. It doesn't mean they support the abuse of the children in the images. It doesn't mean they want to harm children themselves. An individual may in some way have "contributed to the trade of child porn", and this in itself is unacceptable. But putting things in perspective, the downloading of an image does NOT contribute to the abuse of a child, because in all probability the child themselves is 100% naive to that particular exchange. Banning child pornography does not go any significant way to "protecting the public".

    This is a sanctimonious comment from a judge who doesn't know how lucky he is to be attracted to adults.

    Report as unsuitable

  3. Default avatar

    3. 27 Nov 2009 21:17blue_chip said

    should add, in the above comment I am addressing the passive possession of child pornography, NOT the production, or where there is evidence that a paedophile is actually abusing children. There isn't really a supply-demand chain going on here, something so fundamental to human activity as sexuality does not require demand.

    Report as unsuitable

Posts are not actively monitored by STV. The views expressed are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of STV.

Related Articles

Poll - Scotland's drinking

How do we solve Scotand's alcohol problem?

Video