News

You're not signed in
Sign in
Sign up

US accuses Britain of 'stonewalling' Lockerbie investigation

VIDEO: Kenny MacAskill, Alex Salmond and Jack Straw refused to attend a now-postponed Senate hearing into the release of Megrahi.

28 July 2010 13:21 GMT

188839
Video will appear here shortly.

A string of high profile British witnesses who refused to testify at a US Senate hearing into the release of the Lockerbie bomber have been accused of "stonewalling".

The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee postponed a hearing due to take place on Thursday after key witnesses including former Justice Secretary Jack Straw, Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and First Minister Alex Salmond turned down requests to attend.

Senator Robert Menendez, a Democrat who was due to chair the hearing, said "no witness of consequence has the courage" to step up and clear the air. However, he insisted the hearing would go ahead "in the near future" despite their non-attendance.

US accuses Britain of 'stonewalling' Lockerbie investigation

He said: "It is utterly disappointing and I think pretty outrageous that none of these key witnesses will cooperate with our request to answer questions before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. They have stonewalled."

The committee is investigating whether BP lobbied for Abdelbaset al Megrahi's release to help get a $900m exploration agreement with Libya off the ground.

BP acknowledged it urged the British government to sign a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya, but stressed it did not specify his case.

The Scottish Government has also insisted that BP had no influence on the decision to release Megrahi, arguing the agreement with Libya was not invoked in his case.

In Detail

Mr Menendez also attacked outgoing BP boss Tony Hayward for refusing to testify, saying: "It is apparently more important to BP and Mr Hayward to focus on his multi-million dollar golden parachute than to help answer serious lingering questions about whether the company advocated trading blood for oil."

He spoke after the UK Government said that "significant lessons" were learned in relations with Scotland after the row over the freeing of Megrahi.

In a response to a recent Scottish Affairs Select Committee report into relations between the two administrations, the Tory-Lib Dem coalition said it wants to build more "positive relations" with Edinburgh.

The Government response read: "We believe that there are significant lessons from this disagreement that have already been learnt.

"The Government's priority is to build more positive relations with the Scottish Government in all areas."

The SNP government clashed with the previous Labour administration at Westminster over a controversial "deal in the desert", which was agreed with Libya three years ago without Edinburgh's knowledge.

The Memorandum of Understanding paved the way for a prisoner transfer agreement (PTA), which Megrahi unsuccessfully applied for to Scottish ministers.

The response states: "In future the Government will consider carefully the appropriate balance between interests of confidentiality and the responsibility to keep the Scottish Government informed of international agreements made on its behalf.

"This includes consultation with the devolved administrations on matters relating to international relations which touch upon devolved matters."

Megrahi remains the only person ever convicted of the 1988 bombing, which killed 270 people. He was released on compassionate grounds last August after medical evidence indicated he only had three months live.

Calls for the decision to release Megrahi to be re-examined grew in volume in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and revelations that BP lobbied for the PTA, amid concern that ditching it could damage an exploration deal it signed in Libya.

Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora died in the crash, said he did not believe the Scottish Government had been influenced by BP’s commercial interests.  

He told Radio Scotland: "That's a question that if anyone from Britain could address, it would be people from Westminster.

"People have forgotten that there is no real link between his release and the so-called 'deal in the desert', because Kenny MacAskill and Alex Salmond didn't want to touch the prisoner transfer agreement which was set up in the deal in the desert."

Megrahi was eventually freed under compassionate release after medical evidence indicated the bomber had three months to live. The fact he remains alive almost a year later has fuelled the anger of some victim’s relatives.

However, Dr Swire said he still believes that Megrahi has been the victim of a miscarriage of justice.

He added: "Are we not interested that the man who has been freed by Kenny MacAskill might, in fact, not be the man who was involved in causing the tragedy?

"That seems to me over-ridingly a more important question than the question of the minutiae of why he was freed.

"I can understand why they major in on those aspects of it, but I do think it's relatively peripheral."

Background

Ads by Google

Share

There are 3 comments

You need to be logged in to comment.

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

  1. Default avatar

    1. 28 Jul 2010 14:59truth said

    No, the Senate was stonewalling when it failed to invite Tony Blair.

    He, after all, was the architect of the "deal in the desert". You can't have a credible investigation if he was not on the radar.

    Report as unsuitable

  2. Default avatar

    2. 28 Jul 2010 21:07Stravaiger of Scotland said

    Full marks to STV for providing a factual account, complete with video footage, of the Senator's statement and the full response from Alex Salmond. Just the facts, that is all we want.

    BBC in Scotland are not covering themselves in glory over this matter.

    Report as unsuitable

  3. Default avatar

    3. 29 Jul 2010 16:01Torricelli said

    They have been told repeatedly by Scottish ministers, and by BP that no agreements were tied to the release of AL- Megrahi, that it was a release on the medical grounds.

    Scottish or British politicians are not required to attend the US senate when it orders, we are not a US state, the arrogance of these people is unbelievable.

    What these people are implying is beyond the pale, this is getting more like a witch hunt by the day,if they have anything resembling proof of their allegations then publish it, we will deal with our own politicians thank you.

    Report as unsuitable

Posts are not actively monitored by STV. The views expressed are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of STV.

Watch now

Video