News

You're not signed in
Sign in
Sign up

Scots oil workers embroiled in Falklands' row

About 50 workers are among the crew of the Ocean Guardian rig which is drilling for oil amid a diplomatic row with Argentina.

23 February 2010 18:51 GMT

159440
Video will appear here shortly.

Scots workers are at the heart of an escalating row with Argentina over new controls on ships passing through its water to the Falkland Islands.

The workers are part of a crew of 72 on board a rig that is searching for oil off the islands.

The Ocean Guardian rig left Invergordon in November and has taken three months to reach the Falklands.

Scots oil workers embroiled in Falklands' row

Its crew are now searching for an estimated 60billion barrels of oil.

Argentina is angry at the move, which comes 28 years after it invaded the UK-controlled islands.

The British Government has given approval to drill near the Falklands despite opposition from Argentina, which still claims sovereignty over the islands and its waters.

On Tuesday 32 Latin American and Caribbean countries backed Argentina at a summit in Mexico, including Venezuela, over the issue.

Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez was one of the most vocal against Britain.

He said: "Queen of England I'm talking to you. Queen of England the times of Empires are over, didn't you hear?  Give the Falklands back to the Argentine people, Queen of England.

"The English continue to threaten Argentina but times have changed dear Queen - it is no longer 1982. If Argentina is attacked you can bet on it you will not be alone like it was before. "

The Falklands' conflict lasted 78 days when UK forces regained control of the Falklands when the Argentineans invaded. But more than 250 British servicemen died.

This time around the row remains diplomatic.

Argentinean president Cristina Fernadez de Kirchner, said: "I think the important thing is that we achieved a very strong support for the legitimacy of our claims and fundamentally in reference to the new petroleum activity taking place since the installation of the newly installed platform."

The UK Foreign Office said the Falkland Islands' waters were controlled by its authorities and would not be affected by the drilling.

Jake Malloy, Oil Industry Liaison Committee (OILC),  admitted that here in Scotland families would have reservations.

He said: "There will be some concerns among the families here and I would hope that the companies are able to reassure them that their loved ones will not be caught up in a diplomatic row over oil and gas."

The Government insists it will do whatever is necessary to protect the islands.

Labour's Inverclyde MP David Cairns, whose constituents built the Ocean Guardian, said ministers should closely monitor Britain's military presence.

He said: "We need to keep an eye on that, any more of the sabre-rattling seen today from the likes of Hugo Chavez, and I hope the Government is keeping that under review."

On Tuesday Defence Minister Bill Rammell told the Commons that Britain will take "whatever steps are necessary" to protect the islands and the oil workers.

Ads by Google

Share

There are 12 comments

You need to be logged in to comment.

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

  1. Avatar for cable guy

    1. 24 Feb 2010 21:14cable guy said

    Funny how Britain used to rule half the world and now only has left a rag tag bunch of territories left after being kicked out of everywhere important like America, India and Hong Kong.

    The population of Britain’s remaining dependencies is between 50 and max 53,000 per territory - 53,000 is equivalent to the population of Livingston!).

    The fact of the matter is if Argentina had shipped an oil rig and started drilling off the east coat of an Argentinean dependency of say the Orkneys, there would be an outcry in the UK that Orkney was a natural part of Scotland or the UK and Argentina was exploiting a local natural resources at the expense of the UK.

    Anyway, I can think of another country that Discovered oil off its coast forty years ago and just end up poorer and allegedly in permanent budget deficit. Hee Hee.

    Remaining British Dependencies;

    Anguilla, the British Antarctic Territory, Bermuda, the British Indian Ocean Territory, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, St Helena and Dependencies (Ascension Island and Tristan da Cunha), the Turks and Caicos Islands, Pitcairn Island, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands, and the Sovereign Base Areas on Cyprus.

    Highest populated area Caymen Islands 53,000. Lowest South Georgia 99. Falkland Islands 3000.

    Wiki Source.

    Report as unsuitable

  2. Default avatar

    2. 27 Feb 2010 13:34rollinstone said

    Britain should give up the ghost of it's imperialist past,we,ve had a good run of robbing countries of their mineral wealth. can you imagine the outcry if Argentina laid claim to the

    Hebrides or Orkney islands.

    Report as unsuitable

  3. Default avatar

    3. 04 Mar 2010 12:22FunnyStuff said

    Poor Argentina, they know they won't stand a chance if they invade YET AGAIN so they have to get all chatty infront of the TV cameras instead. It's a real shame because there are so many other problems in Argentina right now, yet your so-called "government" simply wants to stir up trouble again to take the spotlight off other problems.

    I feel sorry for the Argentine people who will inevitably get caught up in this on the whims of their leader. However, you should understand that any attempts to take the islands by force will end in failure. Hell, any south American countries are welcome to join Argentina and we'll be happy to wipe you out too.

    Report as unsuitable

  4. Default avatar

    4. 04 Mar 2010 12:33FunnyStuff said

    Oh, and those hypothetical situations with Argentina drilling off the coast of UK territory? The fact that Argentina can't take over islands a few hundred miles off their coast, leads me to believe they would not be capable of the logistics involved.

    There's also the small matter of the Royal Navy defending our waters. Does Argentina even have a bluewater navy?

    Report as unsuitable

  5. Default avatar

    5. 08 Mar 2010 12:04sannymac said

    The Oil is in the territorial waters of the Falklands and the Falklands are an independent territory with no association with Argentina. Any attempt by Argentina to take the oil or land by force would be an act of war and we would respond accordingly.

    If the Falklands wish to disassociate form the UK they have the legal right to do so; that does not mean that they would automatically become part of Argentina.

    Report as unsuitable

  6. Default avatar

    6. 11 Mar 2010 00:39Pragmatic punter said

    You are correct sanimac if as thge great Hugo chavez says the days of empire are over then why would the falklands be part of an ancient argentine empire! The people of the falklands can make their own wishes on the matter made known to the UN. BTW I hope these countries who are all against the uk are also against receiving aid from us in the event of earthquakes volcanic eruptions etc!

    Report as unsuitable

  7. Default avatar

    7. 20 Mar 2010 19:57penfold2489 said

    I think all the big countrys in the world need to get a grip as the way this world is going to end up in a world war

    usa uk argintenia iraq iran they all the same money grabbing two faced bastids who all they give a sh1t about is lining there own pockets the common person in world dont care as long as they got jobs and can earn a crust but we cant do that because all these poltiticions just wana get rich and screw the common people

    And as for all them south americans that have ideas of joining argentina well watch that space do u think we will lay down and take it well you got another thing coming we will fight to the bitter end and you will lose

    Report as unsuitable

  8. Default avatar

    8. 21 Mar 2010 11:28Frank Martin said

    FunnyStuff said:

    "However, you should understand that any attempts to take the islands by force will end in failure. Hell, any south American countries are welcome to join Argentina and we'll be happy to wipe you out too."

    Good grief!

    The last war was a close run thing at points. And that was when the Argentinian forces consisted mainly of barley trained conscripts. Their air force knocked lumps out of us. Grand comments like that are childlike FunnyStuff.

    sannymac said:

    "The fact that Argentina can't take over islands a few hundred miles off their coast, leads me to believe they would not be capable of the logistics involved."

    It was a hypothetical dude. We were barley capable of getting our troops down their at the time. We had to hire cruise liners cos that muppet Thatcher sold off the troop carriers shortly before. I recommend reading, 'Nine Battles to Stanley', by Nicholas van der Bijl.

    The Shetland Isles are 200km off the Scottish Mainland. The Falklands are 400km off Argentina. Not that big a difference btw.

    Report as unsuitable

  9. Default avatar

    9. 21 Mar 2010 11:32Frank Martin said

    Sorry... their about 500km off Argentina

    Report as unsuitable

  10. Default avatar

    10. 01 Apr 2010 14:18Ambriel said

    The British colonies on the Falklands pre-date the existence of Argentina as a separate nation. If any nation is therefore guilty of colonialism it can only be Argntina.

    The Falkland Islands are an independant state with its own government. It chooses to remain a British Protectorate. That's very different from being a colony.

    Britain retains a strong presence in the North America - some people here seem to have forgotten about Canada which recognises the Queen as its head of state.

    Should Argentina wish to turn pirate nation and attempt to take the islands by force they should remember tht we still have substantial submarine assets and that the effectiveness of their torpedoes was demonstrated to them the last time around.

    Report as unsuitable

  11. Default avatar

    11. 02 Apr 2010 23:04Doigie said

    "The last war was a close run thing at points. And that was when the Argentinian forces consisted mainly of barley trained conscripts. Their air force knocked lumps out of us. Grand comments like that are childlike FunnyStuff"

    Yeah the war back in 82 was definitely a close run affair and they were lucky to pull it off. However as things now stand Britain would have no problem defending the islands from Argentina 'broken' air force and navy. There is a heavy military presence on the islands now, and with Britains new fleet of nuclear submarines, destroyers and Eurofighter Typhoons the Argentinians stand far less of a chance now than they did back in 82!

    Report as unsuitable

  12. Default avatar

    12. 04 Apr 2010 21:42The Vanisher said

    Argentina do not have any rights to The Falklands,and if they push the legal issue they will probably be forced to pay The British Government Billions of dollars for starting a war as a precondition for starting any bilateral talks. A final solution would be for the world to accept The Falklands as a full member of The UN,

    Report as unsuitable

You need to be logged in to comment.

sign in

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

Posts are not actively monitored by STV. The views expressed are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of STV.

Online bulletin: Rangers intend to go into administration

 

Watch now

Video