News

You're not signed in
Sign in
Sign up

Independence referendum would be 'open to challenge in the courts'

Scottish Parliament 'does not have power to legislate for a referendum on independence' says Advocate General for Scotland Lord Wallace.

20 January 2012 00:01 GMT

294327
Video will appear here shortly.

A court challenge against the Scottish independence referendum "is likely to be successful" if it does not have the legal backing of Westminster, the UK`s top law adviser in Scotland will say on Friday.

Advocate General for Scotland Lord Wallace will set out the UK Government's conclusions on the competence of the Scottish Parliament to legislate for a referendum on independence during a lecture at Glasgow University.

He will say that the Scottish Parliament "does not have power to legislate for a referendum on independence".

Independence referendum would be 'open to challenge in the courts'

Speaking in advance of the lecture, Lord Wallace said: "The Scotland Act 1998 is clear: the Scottish Parliament cannot legislate on matters reserved to the UK Parliament."

He added that as the Union is a reserved matter, any Act of the Scottish Parliament that relates to the Union is "not law".

Lord Wallace, a former Deputy First Minister of Scotland and Scottish Liberal Democrat party leader, said: "A referendum must do something, and mean something, otherwise it is hardly a proper use of public money.

"It would not have a purpose in its own right and it is not merely an opinion poll — a referendum is, or at least purports to be, a form of political decision making, where a decision is best made directly by the public rather than by their representatives in Parliament.

"If, as the law currently stands, the Scottish Government were to proceed with this legislation, it would be open to challenge in the courts.

"It is the view of the UK Government that such a challenge is likely to be successful.

"It could be initiated in the Court of Session by any individual or organisation which could demonstrate sufficient interest to bring proceedings.

"The challenge could invalidate the outcome of the referendum, it would cause delay, and it could stop any referendum from happening in the first place."

A spokesman for Scotland's First Minister, Alex Salmond, said: "The UK Government has published its opinion, not its legal advice — and the Scottish Government have set out our position in a number of documents since May 2007.

"We are entirely confident about our legal basis to hold a consultative referendum — as confirmed by a range of experts.

"In any event, we have absolutely no objection to a Section 30 enhancement of Holyrood's powers to hold a legally binding referendum, but what we cannot possibly accept is Westminster dictating the terms of Scotland's referendum.

"The Westminster parties should have a care, for their own sake — they have badly misjudged this issue, and badly misjudged the mood of people in Scotland.

"The sabre rattling of the Westminster parties — ganging up with each other, and trying to bounce Scotland into an early referendum and dictate the terms — has seen support for independence already reach 40%."

Ads by Google

Share

There are 6 comments

You need to be logged in to comment.

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

  1. Default avatar

    1. 20 Jan 2012 09:48Urisk said

    These are my opinions in the debate. Only a fool cannot see that Scotland's relationship with Westminster has all the classic hallmarks of an abusive relationship. Everyone has seen the situation where an abusive creep tells his partner she is worthless, in order to keep her, and then takes more direct action when she looks like breaking away. I, myself, worked as a consultant to a company who told me repeatedly that I would not make it in business myself, and that only they would provide me with the latitude I required to operate. I was making them a lot of money and when I broke away they were shocked, and tried to stop me using a mix of incentives and threats. Since then I have prospered and they have failed. Abusive relationships always follow the same pattern, whether they involve spouses, businesspeople or countries. scotland has been fed on a constant diet of how worthless it is and now is getting a slap when it has started to reach for the door. The door is the only rational option, however, and Alex Salmond is doing an exceppent job of warding off the blows of Scotland's creep desperate partner.

    Report as unsuitable

  2. Default avatar

    2. 20 Jan 2012 10:49sannymac said

    When do the various Unionist Reporters think they will embrace the truth?

    If the majority party in Scotland, supported by the Scottish people, decide to declare their Independence or simply to withdraw from the Treaty of Union There is NO COURT that can over-rule them!

    An Independent Scotland, by any means, would be welcomed by Europe and the UN. All this nonsense abouts court action is simply the Unionists trying to muddy the waters.

    Report as unsuitable

  3. Default avatar

    3. 20 Jan 2012 12:22Gibby 44 said

    Who gave Westminster the right to change the Law of the 1707 Union agreement in 1998; if Brown had anything to do with it he should be sent packing from Scotland. That which was agreed in 1707 was never adhered to by England then what chance now, Wake up Scotland.

    The Cameron Chiefs; Later Lords, Spent years in England before returning to build Inverarry Castle and built a new village, not just for the benefit of their people. From the Duke crowning Charles II to changing sides to Cromwell, later executed by Charles, all of this led eventually to the massacre of Scottish Clans. Now Cameron and Co, want to enslave us again. A handful of Silver in 1707 to buy our Lords was bad enough; Now Cameron must think he can again do a “Queen Ann Number on Scotland”. Think again Cameron WE HAVE YOUR NUMBER.

    Report as unsuitable

  4. Default avatar

    4. 20 Jan 2012 14:44flicker said

    Independence referendum would be the worst thing that could happen in Scotland. What fools are we to give them crooks in Edinburgh more power just look at the money spent on the building of the Scottish Parliament hoods don't even cover it. Then they bring in laws that are not needed or wanted just so they can band stand there positions and we would give them more power. Look at the story of the fox and the chickens?

    Report as unsuitable

  5. Default avatar

    5. 21 Jan 2012 19:00Krystyna said

    None of my friends nor I wish to be under Alex Salmond's reign. He has no right to demand an independent Scotland, we do not want it. He just wants to feed his own ego. It will be the downfall of Scotland and will only cause more animosity. See he's off on a trip paid for us now. Notice also he's getting fatter, too much rich food!

    Report as unsuitable

  6. Default avatar

    6. 21 Jan 2012 19:03Krystyna said

    None of my friends nor I wish to be under Alex Salmond's reign. He has no right to demand an independent Scotland, we do not want it. He just wants to feed his own ego. It will be the downfall of Scotland and will only cause more animosity. See he's off on a trip paid for us now. Notice also he's getting fatter, too much rich food!

    Report as unsuitable

You need to be logged in to comment.

sign in

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

Posts are not actively monitored by STV. The views expressed are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of STV.

Watch now

Video